{ "schemaVersion": "artifactExample.v2", "artifactId": "PBIVC", "title": "Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist", "definitionRef": { "artifactId": "PBIVC", "definitionSchemaVersion": "artifactDefinition.v2", "definitionId": "PBIVC.artifactDefinition.v2", "title": "Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist" }, "organization": "Arcfield", "sections": [ { "id": "title_page", "title": "Title Page", "values": { "Document Title": "Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist", "Document ID": "PBIVC-CHK-001", "Version": "1.1", "Status": "Approved", "Organization": "Arcfield", "Owner": "Business Continuity Manager", "Approver": "ISMS Manager", "Classification": "Internal", "Effective Date": "2026-09-11", "Next Review Date": "2027-09-11" }, "items": [ "Document Title: Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist", "Document ID: PBIVC-CHK-001", "Version: 1.1", "Status: Approved", "Organization: Arcfield", "Owner: Business Continuity Manager", "Approver: ISMS Manager", "Classification: Internal", "Effective Date: 2026-09-11", "Next Review Date: 2027-09-11" ], "contentType": "metadata" }, { "id": "abstract", "title": "Abstract", "text": "This example validates business impact assumptions for Arcfield customer onboarding. It shows how process owners confirm criticality, impact assumptions, RTO/RPO targets, dependencies, minimum resources, validation checks, gaps and the final business-impact validation decision. This checklist tests whether the 11 September 2026 freeze is complete for the surveillance cycle after certificate ARC-ISMS-2025-001.", "contentType": "narrative" }, { "id": "document_control", "title": "Document Control", "contentType": "control_table" }, { "id": "change_log", "title": "Revision history", "groups": [ { "text": "A published change is a new row. Do not edit an approved version in place." }, { "rows": [ { "Version": "1.0", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Change": "Initial Arcfield Platform publication.", "Approved by": "ISMS Manager" }, { "Version": "1.1", "Date": "2026-09-11", "Change": "Approved Arcfield worked example after the 11 September 2026 internal audit.", "Approved by": "ISMS Manager" } ] } ], "contentType": "revision_table" }, { "id": "instructions", "title": "Instructions", "groups": [ { "text": "Copy this file as the controlled Word master for your ISMS. The Arcfield identity fields on the cover are the approved worked example. Complete the steps below when you adopt the file for your organization." }, { "items": [ "Fill the cover identity fields (Organization, Version, Classification, Owner, Approver, Effective Date and Next Review Date) when you adopt this file. The Arcfield values shown here are the approved worked example.", "Issue your own version and a new Revision history row. Do not edit an approved version in place.", "Cite this approved version from related records. Do not copy this file into those records." ] } ], "contentType": "ordered_list" }, { "id": "process_context", "title": "Process context", "values": { "Process name": "Customer onboarding", "Process owner": "Head of Product Operations", "Business unit": "SaaS Platform", "Criticality": "High", "Customers impacted": "Enterprise customers", "Regulatory relevance": "Contractual SLA and data protection obligations", "BIA reference": "BIA-2026-003", "Review trigger": "Annual BIA refresh" }, "text": "Describe the real process and accountability context for the business impact validation.", "groups": [ { "id": "introduction", "heading": "What this checklist is", "level": 1, "text": "This document is Arcfield's Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist. Provide auditable evidence for Process Owner Business Impact Validation Checklist. It is not a methodology essay or the governing policy. This checklist applies to the Arcfield Platform (B2B SaaS for regulated fintech and health customers): production, customer data, CI/CD, privileged access and critical suppliers. Neighbouring records (BIA, AOAVC, ISO) cite this Document Control version. Do not copy these paragraphs into them." }, { "id": "scope", "heading": "Scope", "level": 1, "text": "Use this table before you copy a rule into another record or exclude a duty from this file.", "rows": [ { "In this file": "The rules, roles, worked Arcfield example and the records this file owns.", "Not in this file": "The ISMS boundary (ISS), Annex A selection (SoA) or live rows in BIA, AOAVC, ISO." }, { "In this file": "Interfaces that must cite this Document Control version, including CI/CD, identity and suppliers where they affect CIA.", "Not in this file": "Live ISS scope rows, SoA applicability decisions, or neighbouring live registers. Those files keep their own approved versions; this file does not duplicate them." } ] }, { "id": "terms", "heading": "Terms used here", "level": 1, "text": "These terms are local to this file. Expand every acronym on first use in the body.", "rows": [ { "Term": "Check ID", "Meaning": "The stable identifier for one check or question. Do not reuse an ID for a different question." }, { "Term": "Exception", "Meaning": "A time-bound, approved departure with expiry and a compensating control." }, { "Term": "CIA", "Meaning": "Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of in-scope information and services." }, { "Term": "Document Control version", "Meaning": "The approved version cited from neighbouring records. Do not copy this body into those records." } ] }, { "id": "process_context", "heading": "Process context", "level": 1, "text": "Use this table for process context in the Arcfield Platform ISMS. Describe the real process and accountability context for the business impact validation. Field Value Process name Customer onboarding Process owner Head of Product Operations Business unit SaaS Platform Criticality High Customers impacted Enterprise customers Regulatory relevance Contractual SLA and data protection obligations BIA reference BIA-2026-003 Review trigger Annual BIA refresh Cite this Document Control version from neighbouring records.", "rows": [ { "Field": "Process name", "Value": "Customer onboarding" }, { "Field": "Process owner", "Value": "Head of Product Operations" }, { "Field": "Business unit", "Value": "SaaS Platform" }, { "Field": "Criticality", "Value": "High" }, { "Field": "Customers impacted", "Value": "Enterprise customers" }, { "Field": "Regulatory relevance", "Value": "Contractual SLA and data protection obligations" }, { "Field": "BIA reference", "Value": "BIA-2026-003" }, { "Field": "Review trigger", "Value": "Annual BIA refresh" } ] }, { "id": "validation_checklist", "heading": "Validation checklist", "level": 1, "text": "Use this table for validation checklist in the Arcfield Platform ISMS. Use this table as the main validation audit trail with one row per performed asset-owner check. Check ID Area What was validated Required? Performed by Approved by Date Result Evidence reference Notes AOAVC-001 Asset identity Asset ID AST-001, asset name Production platform, owner, custodian and lifecycle status Yes Asset Manager Service Owner 2026-08-29 Successful AI-AST-001-2026-Q3 Matches Asset Inventory. AOAVC-002 Classification Confidential classification and CIA needs for Production platform Yes Asset Owner ISMS Manager 2026-08-29 Successful CLASS-AST-001-2026-Q3 Confidentiality high, availability high. AOAVC-003 Dependencies Cloud hosting, identity provider and backup dependency links Yes IT Operations Service Owner 2026-08-29 Pending DEP-AST-001-2026-Q3 Supplier contact update pending. Cite this Document Control version from neighbouring records.", "rows": [ { "Check ID": "AOAVC-001", "Area": "Asset identity", "What was validated": "Asset ID AST-001, asset name Production platform, owner, custodian and lifecycle status", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "Asset Manager", "Approved by": "Service Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "AI-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Matches Asset Inventory." }, { "Check ID": "AOAVC-002", "Area": "Classification", "What was validated": "Confidential classification and CIA needs for Production platform", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "Asset Owner", "Approved by": "ISMS Manager", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "CLASS-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Confidentiality high, availability high." }, { "Check ID": "AOAVC-003", "Area": "Dependencies", "What was validated": "Cloud hosting, identity provider and backup dependency links", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "IT Operations", "Approved by": "Service Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Pending", "Evidence reference": "DEP-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Supplier contact update pending." } ] }, { "id": "evidence_reviewed", "heading": "Evidence reviewed", "level": 1, "text": "Use this table for evidence reviewed in the Arcfield Platform ISMS. Record the evidence reviewed to support the validation conclusion. Evidence item Source system / document Owner Date reviewed Quality result Gap identified? Evidence reference Notes Asset Inventory extract for AST-001 Asset Inventory Asset Manager 2026-08-29 Complete No AI-AST-001-2026-Q3 Owner and classification present. Access Control Matrix for Production platform Access Control Matrix IT Operations 2026-08-29 Partial Yes ACM-APP-CRM-2026-Q3 Supplier contact needs update. Cite this Document Control version from neighbouring records.", "rows": [ { "Evidence item": "Asset Inventory extract for AST-001", "Source system / document": "Asset Inventory", "Owner": "Asset Manager", "Date reviewed": "2026-08-29", "Quality result": "Complete", "Gap identified?": "No", "Evidence reference": "AI-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Owner and classification present." }, { "Evidence item": "Access Control Matrix for Production platform", "Source system / document": "Access Control Matrix", "Owner": "IT Operations", "Date reviewed": "2026-08-29", "Quality result": "Partial", "Gap identified?": "Yes", "Evidence reference": "ACM-APP-CRM-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Supplier contact needs update." } ] }, { "id": "validation_decision", "heading": "Validation decision", "level": 1, "text": "Use this table for validation decision in the Arcfield Platform ISMS. State the final validation decision. Field Value Validation result Conditionally accepted Accepted by owner Service Owner Reviewer ISMS Manager Open blocker decision No access blocker; supplier contact update remains open Final status Conditionally complete Decision date 2026-08-29 Evidence reference AOAVC-DEC-2026-Q3 Cite this Document Control version from neighbouring records.", "rows": [ { "Field": "Validation result", "Value": "Conditionally accepted" }, { "Field": "Accepted by owner", "Value": "Service Owner" }, { "Field": "Reviewer", "Value": "ISMS Manager" }, { "Field": "Open blocker decision", "Value": "No access blocker; supplier contact update remains open" }, { "Field": "Final status", "Value": "Conditionally complete" }, { "Field": "Decision date", "Value": "2026-08-29" }, { "Field": "Evidence reference", "Value": "AOAVC-DEC-2026-Q3" } ] } ], "contentType": "field_table" }, { "id": "impact_assumptions", "title": "Impact assumptions", "groups": [ { "text": "Use this table or list as the working record. Name owners, systems and evidence so a second person can apply the same rule." }, { "rows": [ { "Impact area": "Customer service", "Assumption": "Onboarding disruption longer than one business day delays enterprise go-live.", "Time threshold": "1 business day", "Impact rating": "High", "Validated by": "Process Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "BIA-2026-003", "Notes": "Confirmed with customer-success data." }, { "Impact area": "Revenue", "Assumption": "Delayed onboarding may defer monthly recurring revenue recognition.", "Time threshold": "3 business days", "Impact rating": "Medium", "Validated by": "Finance Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "FIN-BIA-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Materiality below crisis threshold." }, { "Impact area": "Compliance", "Assumption": "Manual onboarding workaround must preserve approval and data-processing evidence.", "Time threshold": "Immediate", "Impact rating": "High", "Validated by": "Compliance Manager", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Pending", "Evidence reference": "DPIA-ONB-2026", "Notes": "Manual workaround evidence template needs update." } ] } ], "contentType": "evidence_table" }, { "id": "rto_rpo_validation", "title": "RTO / RPO validation", "groups": [ { "text": "Use this table or list as the working record. Name owners, systems and evidence so a second person can apply the same rule." }, { "rows": [ { "Service / data set": "Customer onboarding workflow", "RTO": "8 hours", "RPO": "4 hours", "Business justification": "Enterprise onboarding commitments and customer communication cadence.", "Technical feasibility": "Feasible with current backup and SaaS export capability", "Validated by": "Operations Lead", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "DRP-ONB-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Restore test supports target." }, { "Service / data set": "Customer setup records", "RTO": "1 business day", "RPO": "24 hours", "Business justification": "Records can be reconstructed from ticket history if needed.", "Technical feasibility": "Feasible", "Validated by": "Service Owner", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "BACKUP-VERIFY-2026-08", "Notes": "Export process documented." } ] } ], "contentType": "evidence_table" }, { "id": "dependencies_and_resources", "title": "Dependencies and minimum resources", "groups": [ { "text": "Use this table or list as the working record. Name owners, systems and evidence so a second person can apply the same rule." }, { "rows": [ { "Dependency / resource": "Customer Portal", "Type": "Application", "Minimum requirement": "Read/write access for onboarding team", "Provider / owner": "Product Systems Owner", "Availability assumption": "Available during business hours", "Validation result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "SAS-CUSTPORTAL-2026", "Notes": "Covered in architecture statement." }, { "Dependency / resource": "CloudDesk Support", "Type": "Supplier SaaS", "Minimum requirement": "Ticket access and customer communication queue", "Provider / owner": "Supplier Manager", "Availability assumption": "Supplier SLA supports recovery objective", "Validation result": "Pending", "Evidence reference": "SINV-CLOUDDESK-FU-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Latest restore-test evidence requested." }, { "Dependency / resource": "Product Operations team", "Type": "People", "Minimum requirement": "Two trained operators", "Provider / owner": "Head of Product Operations", "Availability assumption": "Holiday cover available", "Validation result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "TRC-PRODOPS-2026", "Notes": "Coverage confirmed." } ] } ], "contentType": "evidence_table" }, { "id": "validation_checklist", "title": "Validation checklist", "rows": [ { "Check ID": "AOAVC-001", "Area": "Asset identity", "What was validated": "Asset ID AST-001, asset name Production platform, owner, custodian and lifecycle status", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "Asset Manager", "Approved by": "Service Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "AI-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Matches Asset Inventory." }, { "Check ID": "AOAVC-002", "Area": "Classification", "What was validated": "Confidential classification and CIA needs for Production platform", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "Asset Owner", "Approved by": "ISMS Manager", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Successful", "Evidence reference": "CLASS-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Confidentiality high, availability high." }, { "Check ID": "AOAVC-003", "Area": "Dependencies", "What was validated": "Cloud hosting, identity provider and backup dependency links", "Required?": "Yes", "Performed by": "IT Operations", "Approved by": "Service Owner", "Date": "2026-08-29", "Result": "Pending", "Evidence reference": "DEP-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Supplier contact update pending." } ], "text": "Use this table as the main validation audit trail with one row per performed asset-owner check.", "contentType": "evidence_log_table" }, { "id": "gaps_and_actions", "title": "Gaps and actions", "groups": [ { "text": "Use this table or list as the working record. Name owners, systems and evidence so a second person can apply the same rule." }, { "rows": [ { "Gap / action ID": "PBIVC-GAP-001", "Description": "CloudDesk supplier restore-test evidence not yet received.", "Related process": "Customer onboarding", "Priority": "Medium", "Owner": "Supplier Manager", "Due date": "2026-09-20", "Status": "Open", "Evidence reference": "SINV-CLOUDDESK-FU-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Track before next BIA approval." }, { "Gap / action ID": "PBIVC-GAP-002", "Description": "Manual workaround evidence template requires update.", "Related process": "Customer onboarding", "Priority": "Medium", "Owner": "Compliance Manager", "Due date": "2026-09-25", "Status": "Scheduled", "Evidence reference": "DPIA-ONB-2026", "Notes": "Needed for privacy-safe workaround." } ] } ], "contentType": "action_table" }, { "id": "validation_decision", "title": "Validation decision", "values": { "Process owner confirmation": "Confirmed with conditions", "BCM review": "RTO/RPO values accepted; supplier evidence follow-up remains open.", "Open blocker decision": "No immediate blocker; supplier restore evidence and workaround template are tracked actions.", "Final status": "Conditionally complete", "Decision date": "2026-08-29", "Evidence reference": "PBIVC-DEC-2026-Q3" }, "rows": [ { "Field": "Validation result", "Value": "Conditionally accepted" }, { "Field": "Accepted by owner", "Value": "Service Owner" }, { "Field": "Reviewer", "Value": "ISMS Manager" }, { "Field": "Open blocker decision", "Value": "No access blocker; supplier contact update remains open" }, { "Field": "Final status", "Value": "Conditionally complete" }, { "Field": "Decision date", "Value": "2026-08-29" }, { "Field": "Evidence reference", "Value": "AOAVC-DEC-2026-Q3" } ], "text": "State the final validation decision.", "contentType": "decision_table" }, { "id": "evidence_reviewed", "title": "Evidence reviewed", "rows": [ { "Evidence item": "Asset Inventory extract for AST-001", "Source system / document": "Asset Inventory", "Owner": "Asset Manager", "Date reviewed": "2026-08-29", "Quality result": "Complete", "Gap identified?": "No", "Evidence reference": "AI-AST-001-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Owner and classification present." }, { "Evidence item": "Access Control Matrix for Production platform", "Source system / document": "Access Control Matrix", "Owner": "IT Operations", "Date reviewed": "2026-08-29", "Quality result": "Partial", "Gap identified?": "Yes", "Evidence reference": "ACM-APP-CRM-2026-Q3", "Notes": "Supplier contact needs update." } ], "text": "Record the evidence reviewed to support the validation conclusion.", "contentType": "section" }, { "id": "external_references", "title": "References", "groups": [ { "text": "Cite these sources from workshops and audits. This list names ISO clauses, book chapters and companion artifacts used by this file." }, { "rows": [ { "Kind": "ISO", "Reference": "ISO/IEC 27001:2022", "How this document uses it": "Normative ISMS requirements this companion artifact supports.", "href": "https://www.iso.org/standard/82875.html" }, { "Kind": "Book", "Reference": "Implementation & Certification, Business Impact Analysis & Business Continuity Planning", "How this document uses it": "Primary operating chapter for this companion artifact.", "href": "https://www.amazon.com/s?k=ISO+27001+for+Software+Companies+Implementation+and+Certification" }, { "Kind": "Artifact", "Reference": "BIA Business Impact Analysis (BIA) Statement (Implementation & Certification, Business Impact Analysis & Business Continuity Planning)", "How this document uses it": "Interface record. Cite this Document Control version; do not copy this file into that record.", "href": "https://www.amazon.com/s?k=ISO+27001+for+Software+Companies+Implementation+and+Certification" }, { "Kind": "Artifact", "Reference": "AOAVC Asset Owner Asset Validation Checklist (Implementation & Certification, Asset Management & Information Classification)", "How this document uses it": "Interface record. Cite this Document Control version; do not copy this file into that record.", "href": "https://www.amazon.com/s?k=ISO+27001+for+Software+Companies+Implementation+and+Certification" }, { "Kind": "Artifact", "Reference": "AI Asset Inventory (Implementation & Certification, Asset Management & Information Classification)", "How this document uses it": "Interface record. Cite this Document Control version; do not copy this file into that record.", "href": "https://www.amazon.com/s?k=ISO+27001+for+Software+Companies+Implementation+and+Certification" }, { "Kind": "Artifact", "Reference": "DPIA Data Protection Impact Assessment (Dual Compliance, ISO 27001 & EU Data Act)", "How this document uses it": "Interface record. Cite this Document Control version; do not copy this file into that record.", "href": "https://www.amazon.com/dp/9789908983479" } ], "text": "Use this table or list as the working record. Name owners, systems and evidence so a second person can apply the same rule." } ], "contentType": "reference_table" } ], "enrichment": { "source": "Example.json", "method": "curated-json", "note": "Completes Example JSON with renderer-native sections and generalized groups; no mdSource helper fields." }, "snapshotRef": { "snapshotId": "arcfield.platform.surv.2026-09-11", "schemaVersion": "evidenceSnapshot.v1" }, "scenarioRef": { "githubIssue": 64, "crId": "CR-TYPE-ARCFIELD-001", "family": "Checklist", "role": "Completeness check against the freeze" } }